Yet again, NCAA football fraks it up

Photo by flickr user marylea, via Wikimedia Commons

In the name of ‘player safety’, the NCAA has instituted a rule that if a player’s helmet comes off during the play, they have to leave the field for one game. Of course, as usual, they miss the point; all this does it motivate players to try to remove or dislodge opposing players’ helmets…

Watching the Michigan-Air Force game, I just saw a Michigan defender, while finishing a tackle, appear to obviously try and rip the helmet off of the Air Force quarterback. Not only did it work–thus removing the QB from the game for a play–but it was done at an angle that seemed outright dangerous, while the quarterback was face down on the turf.

How does this improve safety?

I understand a certain angle of reasoning here. A lot of times, when guys’ helmets come off, it’s due to the sort of impact that often concusses or injures players. Moreover, when players’ helmets come off, once in a while they continue to try to make a play–including instances in which they’re in the middle of, or entering, a tackle pile. The possible outcomes of such a play are pretty scary. But the problem with the ‘helmet off, miss a play’ rule misses one key point: it’s QUITE often that the most damaging hits, including the ones that cause concussions, don’t involve the injured player’s helmet being dislodged. This rule is a one-dimensional, one-size-fits-all approach to a problem that might be better mandated by situational interpretation…instead, we have a situation where someone could be knocked into next week and wobble around after a play but still stay on the field, but where a guy’s chinstrap pops and he’s removed from the game.

It’s also flat-out incentive to try to remove opponent’s helmets. The NCAA’s failure to account for this would be baffling if, well, it wasn’t the NCAA.

I wonder how long it will take for someone to affect the outcome of a game, in the waning moments, by wrenching the helmet off of a guy. In a pileup, lots of things go on that, well, aren’t spoken of. Do we want to include chinstrap-popping and helmet-wrenching to the litany thereof? How tempting would it be, in a pileup, to de-helmet an opposing lineman and then blitz his gap the next down? Or de-helmet a tight end so his QB doesn’t have a checkdown on the next play? Moreover, how long until the kind of tackling I just saw in the Michigan game results in a neck injury or worse? I just switched to the Oregon State-Wisconsin game, and the announcers were talking about how a defensive lineman’s helmet came off and he was out for a play, so the offense would be wise to ‘take advantage of the personnel’ by running a play between the tackles.

It’s a sad fact that someone will take advantage of this kind of rule to do something dishonorable and affect the game. It’s a stupid, simplistic rule, and a lame attempt at improving player safety.

(postscript, 9/18: I called it here, weeks ago; how the heck did the NCAA not see this coming? See the article below from Yahoo…

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/missouri-latest-team-irked-ncaa-helmet-rule-172946949–ncaaf.html

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Like this story?
Like TARNATION! Sports on Facebook and Follow Us on Twitter
to stay up to date on new posts, and to take part in our fun competitions and giveaways!

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Check out our Sports T Shirts on sale now!

Please like & share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *